Welcome to ArmyAdvice Sign in | Join | Help
in Search

Rusty Cannon

Chronicle of an unexpected trip to Iraq

Reserve Officer Crisis

I posted an article from the Seattle Times that I learned about from an AKO forum topic by the same title.  It is informative.  Unfortunately, it doesn't include the chart showing resignations growing exponentially.  The Army Reserve states that it is at 59% of target for captains and expects it to take five to seven years to correct the imbalance.  Remember when the Army was showing captains the door enmasse in the 90’s?  This “crisis” has been in the making for quite some time.  I vividly remember the Army offering incentives for separated captains RIF’d out after Desert Storm to return to active duty due to shortages in 1998.  I have read several posts from people, enlisted and officer both, who separated from service in the early 90’s under the VSI (Voluntary Separation Initiative) now being called back to duty 14 years later!  There should really be a statue of limitations on that. 

 

One of the key points I took out of the article is that the Army Reserve is denying officer resignation requests from those who have not yet served a tour in Iraq or Afghanistan.  Whether or not this statement is official policy I don’t know.  HRC is more secretive about its personnel policy then the CIA it seems.  The article is worth a read as are the comments in the AKO forum.  Check it out.

Published Wednesday, December 22, 2004 8:40 PM by edquayle

Comments

 

edquayle said:

That sucks! I definitely agree with the quoted officer in that article -- it's not a 'volunteer military' if you can't get out after serving your commitment (even when you're not governed by stoploss). Yuck! I hope more people catch wind of this - it's the first I've heard of it.
December 24, 2004 7:36 PM
 

edquayle said:

In the Colorado Army National Guard, where I am, we're over-strength on officers, at least in the Artillery. We do need more guys to enlist, though. We're not getting as many prior-service Soldiers, I think because they're still active.
December 28, 2004 6:28 PM
 

edquayle said:

Spam sucks
January 20, 2005 11:12 PM
 

edquayle said:

What about if you served two years of involuntary recall after 9-11 but didn't deploy? That's what happened to me. Can I be recalled again? I keep hearing from people about some kind to 2 out of 4, or 2 out 5 year rule. But what I keep reading is that it is a 2 year max - period. I just submitted my resignation in the MP. So I guess I'll see. e-mail me at r3505pir@yahoo.com if you have any solid info.
March 17, 2005 3:09 AM
Anonymous comments are disabled